Building an FPS Game with Unity vs Game Maker Studio 2

This would like to have a word with you about Game Maker. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hei2SEHK_M&feature=youtu.be

im planning on making a PS1 styled horror game and i was wondering what software would be better. I was thinking GameMaker because the 3D graphics arent the best. But Unity is easier to use and i can always make the textures look bad.

Any help is appreciated 🙂

UE4 for sure

Game Maker is 2D at heart and that's fine, games like Undertale show that graphics ain't everything so they should stay that way and not try to be Unity.

I like GMS2 3D Style.

This is a video I need to watch
Im Developing a FPS mobile shooter game with unity so yeah

You can definitely make a good looking 3d game in game maker, you just need to know how to write good shaders.

You want 3D in game maker studio easier? Get buildbox instead

I was expecting more attempts to imitate engines like DOOM in gamemaker, as opposed to modern FPS titles..

I often use Unity for 2d and Game Maker for 3d.

how do it looks with the cost with the different game engines?
My knowing is that GameMaker cost just 100$ only on steam (and this is for permanent no matter how much you earn with your game) and unity cost 400$ / year if you wanna make money with your game…
Do I be correct with this? And wouldn't gamemaker studio 2 be the long-term solution if you want to work with 3D in this case?

Game Maker is not optimized for 3d
Why do you guys keep trying to make 3d games on Game Maker?

Game Maker Studio can make cool 3D games : here is my project , a 3D hack&slash game : https://www.youtube.com/user/seb0lavie/videos .
However, yes … Unity is really a good engine ^^ 🙂

is this a sponsored video or something?

…

Wow GameMaker is the best engine ever

Game maker is for 2D king Unity is king for 3D

A common misconception is that 3D Gamemaker games are low quality because of Gamemaker. The reality is that Gamemaker doesn't do any of the legwork for you so if you can't build a high quality 3D game from absolute scratch, it's going to look amateur. It's like setting up OpenGL with C#, rendering a polygon or two, and saying it's OpenGL's fault that it looks terrible.

It's not user friendly, but it certainly isn't Gamemaker's fault.

Cookiesaun go

ofcourse unitys will be better.. unity is a 3d engine and game maker studio is 2d engine

GameMaker is VASTLY better at 2D. Unity is THE SIZE OF THE UNIVERSE better at 3D. Nuff said.

game maker is made for 2d games, unity is usually for 3d games

the frame rate and glaring colors in game maker was painful to look at!

The literal only advantage something like Unity has over Game maker as far as 3D goes is that it comes with lighting, collisions and a 3D viewport. That only makes it 'better' for 3D for people who are only interested in shitting out a game as fast as possible.

ITS BECAUSE GM IS MEANT FOR 2D

I mean someone could make a pretty boss doom clone in gm if you're trying to have it run at 60

Fun fact: If you can do all the math manually in 3D that GMS2 does for you in 2D, then GMS2 has full 3D support. For those who can already make pixel-perfect instant collision systems, all you really need is a variable in every collidable object specifying its height along the Z axis and you can check for a Z-axis collision with only a small amount of extra difficulty. Hardest part is 3D mapping in a 2D-based level editor – better to find or make your own and load in the exported file.

I suddenly want to make an open-source GMS2 3D engine.

Umm…Hate to break it to you, but the main reason there's 3d engine in Game maker 2 is expressly for 2.5D– 3d models in a 2d world. They even said as much on the tin…

Also, while Unity is friendlier coding wise, it's also got a worse pay model than Game Maker 2. Significantly worse, since you owe them royalties effectively. And in no small amount either. That's why people are bothering with GM2's 3d engine; Unity sucks for game sales effectively.

This is because when using c# in unity, you are accessing a 3d rendering engine in a library. You can do the same with game maker, however this is not default. You can use or make any library or port with game maker through the use of extensions. Xtreme3d, Ultimate3d and Ogre3d were ported to bring directx and opengl rendering etc to game maker 5-8. If you use ultimate3d you can export animated models from blender to .u3d with a plugin. If you use html5 in game maker however, you can write any extension in javascript. So you need 3d in the browser? Import a threejs port into game maker and there you have it. In my opinion being able to use any library you want makes game maker a lot more flexible and usable even today. I mean, look at how broken unity multiplayer programming has been and now there is no multiplayer in the latest release and we're waiting for it. Yet in game maker you just import a javascript socket.io wrapper and you have everything you need to complete a game.

an option to put 3D objects, or scan them and put them in as 2.5D in Game maker would be nice.
game maker has the ability to make games like Ori and the blind forest if the 3D object support was a bit better.
even in a 2D plane.

How did you make the unity fps game.

I love unity

3d vs 2.5d 🙂

When it says vs Gamemaker Studio 2, the thumbnail has original gamemaker logo in it.

You can make a completely awesome game that's 3d in gamemaker. You just need more time.

yeah imma go ahead and install unity

I thing better is unreal engine for this year games and unity is good engine if is used corecly but fps maker is a big CRAAP

ur mom gay

Even Blitz3d is better for 3d than Gamemaker.

unity peasants.i use fps creator x1!

Gamemaker can be awesome with 3d with tools like 3d models, which are easy to add (gmmod), terrain like hills and valleys, lighting, texture filtering, etc. RealTutsGML, I have followed you for a long time but this really hurt me.
I am sorry.
Unscubscribes